EFL STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVES ON USING ChatGPT IN WRITING

Authors

  • Nur Salsabila Universitas Islam Makassar
  • Warsidi Universitas Islam Makassar
  • Sulviana Universitas Islam Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59638/verba.v4i1.676

Abstract

This study aims to explore EFL students’ perspectives on the use of ChatGPT in writing tasks. The research employs a qualitative descriptive method, with data collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The participants consisted of undergraduate students from the English Education Department, who actively engaged with ChatGPT to support their academic writing. The findings reveal two main aspects: 1) Perceived Usefulness, where students acknowledged that ChatGPT helps them generate ideas, improve vocabulary, and enhance sentence structures and Perceived Ease of Use, as most students found the platform accessible, user-friendly, and supportive in completing writing tasks; and 2) Challenges, which include issues such as Information Literacy, Reproduction Literacy and Socio-Emotional Literacy. Overall, students demonstrated positive perceptions of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool in their writing process. However, they also encountered challenges in managing information, reproducing content, and dealing with socio-emotional aspects. Therefore, teacher guidance and students’ critical evaluation are still essential to ensure effective and responsible use of ChatGPT in academic writing.  

References

Agip et al., 2009. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Koperasi. OIKOS Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, II, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.23969/oikos.v2i1.920

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.

Caucheteux, C., Hodgkins, L.-B., Batifol, V., Fouché, L., & Romero, M. (2024). Students’ perspective on the use of artificial intelligence in education. In Creative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 101–113). Springer Nature Switzerland Cham.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.

Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365–387.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York, 32(1), 401–405.

Harmer, J. (2006). Review of “How to teach writing.” Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 246–248.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.

Imran, M. C. (2022). Education, Language, and Culture (EDULEC).

Imran, M. C., Amaliah, N. N., Rampeng, N., Syam, N. N. I., Room, N. F., & Sage, N. (2023). The Feasibility of Artificial Intelligences (AI) in speaking Skill: Lecturers’ perceptions. IJOLEH International Journal of Education and Humanities, 2(2), 135–144.

Imran, M. C., Mursidin, M., & Adawiah, M. (2023). GRAMMAR TRANSLATION METHOD TO ENHANCE STUDENTS’WRITING SKILL. VERBA: Journal of English Language Issues, Trends and Studies, 1(2), 1–6.

Johnson, K. (2017). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Routledge.

Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical english language teaching.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.

Santhosh, R., Abinaya, M., Anusuya, V., & Gowthami, D. (2023). ChatGPT: Opportunities, features and future prospects. 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), 1614–1622.

Sulviana, S. (2022). A Review On The Contextual Teaching And Learning Process Using Procedural Text Writing. JOEL: Journal of Educational and Language Research, 2(5), 827–836.

Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270.

Tian, Z., & Wang, C. (2025). Rethinking Language Education in the Age of Generative AI. Taylor & Francis Group.

Warsidi, W. (2017). The effect of Texts-Based Interactional Feedback (TIF) on the students’ EFL writing. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 2(3), 245–258.

Warsidi, W. (2021). What Communicative Functions to Begin Writing a Research Article Abstract in the Applied Linguistics Discipline? Jurnal Sinestesia, 11(2), 150–161.

Yeboah, A. (2023). Knowledge sharing in organization: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2195027.

Yunus, M. M. (2017). Keterampilan menulis dan permasalahannya.

Zebua, J. A. Z., & Katemba, C. V. (2024). Students’ perceptions of using the OpenAI ChatGPT application in improving writing skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(1), 110–123.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01